Theocracy Or Bust

From the bend-over-here-it-comes department:

TOPEKA, Kan. — Although fixing the economy is the top priority, Republicans who won greater control of state governments in this month’s election are considering how to pursue action on a range of social issues, including abortion, gun rights and even divorce laws.

John Hanna at HuffPo points out that our neighbors, Kansas and Oklahoma, are far more conservative after the November elections:

The tension is particularly visible in Kansas, where the victory by Gov.-elect Sam Brownback, a strong opponent of abortion and gay marriage, has created strong expectations among evangelical supporters.

A similar scenario is taking shape in strongly conservative Oklahoma, where a Republican governor will replace a Democrat, and to a lesser extent in Michigan, Wisconsin and several other states.

All of this means, of course, that evangelical Christians will have a good chance of turning those states into quasi-theocracies.  And they won’t wait too long, as this quote exemplifies:

“We’re not going to spend the next 18 months doing nothing but economic issues,” said Wisconsin Republican Sen. Glenn Grothman, an advocate of tougher abortion restrictions.

Hanna points out that Republicans won all statewide races on the ballot in Kansas and have a 92-33 advantage in the House. Couple that with the election of Sam Brownback, a Christian fanatic, as governor, and the question, “What would Jesus do?” will finally have an answer in Kansas politics.  About the only thing that has stopped religious zealots from turning Kansas (my home state) into an evangelical Vatican has been the presence of Democratic governors.

Brownback, at one time a resident at the now-famous C Street Center, owned by a group of Christian extremists called The Family, was a co-sponsor of the Constitution Restoration Act, which, of course, doesn’t restore the Constitution at all.  But here’s what it does do, according to Wikipedia:

…the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an entity of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer or agent of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official or personal capacity), concerning that entity’s, officer’s, or agent’s acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government. In other words, the bill would limit the power of the federal judiciary specifically in religious liberty cases. The bill also states that judges or other court officials that listen to cases that meet said criteria are to be impeached and convicted.

The Constitution Restoration Act is considered by some to be part of a movement of so-called Christian dominionists*, who in the extreme version believe biblical law should exclusively govern society and in a slightly milder form believe, according to sociologist Sara Diamond,

that Christians alone are Biblically mandated to occupy all secular institutions until Christ returns.

Wikipedia continues:

Diamond declared that this concept “has become the central unifying ideology for the Christian Right” (p. 138, emphasis in original). In 1995, she called it “prevalent on the Christian Right”. Journalist Chip Berlet added in 1998 that, although they represent different theological and political ideas, dominionists assert a Christian duty to take “control of a sinful secular society.”

None of this should come as a surprise, especially in Oklahoma, which has already been the nation’s leader in terms of Talibanic governance.  This time Oklahoma voters exorcised even more Democratic legislator-demons and will have a Republican governor to oversee the transition to a brand of politics that Tulsa’s Oral Roberts would be proud of.

Oh, for a while the evangelicals will tolerate some backsliders among their new politicians.  Hanna quotes Shawnee, Kansas, Republican Owen Donohoe as delicately saying Sam Brownback’s legislative agenda “may not be as conservative as we wish.”  But such grace won’t last forever.  I know evangelicals and they won’t tolerate a failure to enact their holy agenda for too long.  After all, the fate of America as a Christian nation is at stake.

Abortion rights (what’s left of them) and gay rights will definitely be the target of the Christian Taliban as evangelicals and fundamentalists attempt to take their country back and turn it into a theocracy, one state at a time.

And Kansas and Oklahoma represent the low-hanging fruit of that Crusade.

_______________________________

*For more on Sam Brownback’s connection to the dominionist movement and controversial pastor Lou Engle, see here and here.  The short of it is that Brownback apparently lived with Lou Engle for a time and attended “several events” with him, according to Right Wing Watch, which then writes:

So let’s ask Brownback again just which of Engle’s views concern him the most:  Is it his Dominionism? or his view that homosexuality should be criminalized? or his fear that President Obama is unleashing demons upon this nation? or that universities are conditioning students to accept the Mark of the Beast? or maybe that Satan has gained control over the US government?

You get the idea.

Muslims Beware! America Is A Christian Nation

My friend and fellow blogger, Juan Don, made a comment about the mosque-Ground Zero issue that started me thinking: Just exactly what do people mean by the term “hallowed ground,” particularly in reference to what happened on 9/11?

In one sense, I suppose every square inch of America could be considered hallowed, if one believes America was founded through divine inspiration, the Founders being instruments of the Almighty.  I know some do believe that, so it is a wonder any of us who fall short of God’s glory are allowed to call this place home.  But here we are.

When one begins to think about what the phrase really means, though, and why anyone would consider a specific spot of ground hallowed, one is hard-pressed to come up with an answer, outside of a religious context.

Suppose for a minute that 9/11 had been the start of an even greater assault on America by terrorists, and suppose that eventually they conquered us.  Would that same spot where the Twin Towers stood be hallowed ground to them?  Do only the winners get to determine what is hallowed and what is not?

Don’t get me wrong.  I understand why the place where the towers stood should be a national memorial, but only in the sense that the place should be one in which we demonstrate the fact that we emerged the winner after that terrible day.  Sort of like giving the national finger to those, both here and abroad, that would do us harm: Bleep you bastards! We’re still here and thriving like never before!

Which is why the right-wing’s demagoguery–essentially suggesting that Islam is our enemy and Muslims don’t belong on or near “our” hallowed ground–is such nonsense.

To his great credit, George W. Bush firmly established early on after the terrorist attacks that our quarrel was not with Islam.  In a real sense, he helped hallow the Trade Center ground by declaring victory over demagoguery, over prejudice and bigotry, when he affirmed our tradition of freedom of religion and refused to let what happened compromise our national values.

Now, I stand second to none in my criticism of fundamentalist religion, whether it be Judaism, Christianity, or Islam.  In a perfectly designed world (God, are you listening?), those who believe such nonsense would be banished to a rather large island somewhere where they could pound each other with their holy books.

But that analysis overlooks just what one of our national values, “freedom of religion,” really means.  Essentially, religious liberty is intellectual liberty, the freedom to pursue ideas, even dumb ones. 

The crazy folks who picket the funerals of fallen soldiers with anti-homosexual placards are free to do so not because we respect their bullshit religious views, but because we value freedom of thought and expression, so long as violence is not a component of that expression.

To argue that it is inappropriate to build a mosque (actually, it’s mostly a community center) two blocks from the “hallowed ground” in Manhattan misses the point.  It may be inappropriate to some–even as bad as shouting homosexual slurs at those who come to mourn dead soldiers–but what sets apart–hallows–America is the fact that such inappropriateness is legally protected.

And the truth is that most of the folks–largely conservative Christians–who argue against the building of the quasi-mosque know all that. What many of them are really doing is sending a not-so-subtle message: America is a Christian nation, and, by God, you Muslims had better understand that.