Will Democrats Waste An Opportunity To Get A Better Deal For DREAMers? Yep.

“If we don’t change it, let’s have a shutdown. We’ll do a shutdown and it’s worth it for our country. I’d love to see a shutdown…”

—Tr-mp, 2/6/18

as some folks are being distracted by Kim Jung Tr-mp’s creepy despotic desire for a yooge military parade down Pennsylvania Avenue, yet another shutdown looms this week, as funding for the federal government theoretically runs out just after midnight on Friday. But negotiations in the Senate have come to an end, as the Rs and Ds hammered out a two-year deal that would seemingly put an end to this Chinese water torture we’re all experiencing.

But some of us believe Democrats have squandered an opportunity in this moment of agreement.

This morning Nancy Pelosi, who is under attack not just from Republicans but from members of her own party, took to the House floor and began doing what she should do: speaking for Democratic Party values, particularly protecting DREAMers from the fear of TPelosir-mp and his deportation forces and giving them some semblance of peace in this nasty reality show Tr-mp, John Kelly, Stephen Miller, and Sean Hannity are directing.

As you probably know, during the recent government shutdown, Senate Democrats made a “deal” with Mitch McConnell that if they would reopen the government and help Republicans keep it open, then McConnell would bring an immigration bill to the floor that would be accompanied by genuine debate; that is, the bill would be subject to an open amendment process. But even if one could trust McConnell, which one can’t, and an acceptable DREAMer deal could be reached in the Senate, the problem of what to do in the House would still remain. After all, a comprehensive immigration bill passed the Senate in 2013 with bipartisan support and then-Speaker John Boehner refused to bring it up for a vote in the House because, alas, he knew it would pass.

Today we have the same dynamic. And despite Pelosi’s long, long speech this morning, there is no reason to believe things will change.

Even if Democrats and Republicans in the Senate could work out an agreement for DREAMers, there is no evidence that Paul Ryan would move on it in the House. In fact, the evidence goes the other way. Ryan has said he won’t bring up any bill that doesn’t have Tr-mp’s approval, and since Tr-mp’s position is impossible to discern on some days and impossible for Democrats to accept on others, that’s the same as saying, “I don’t care what happens in the Senate. This is Tr-mp’s House.”

But Pelosi says the current budget deal—which she had a hand in negotiating—is a no-go for her “without a commitment from Speaker Ryan comparable to the commitment from Leader McConnell.” On the House floor this morning, she said to Speaker Ryan:

Let Congress work its will. What are you afraid of?

Well, we know what Ryan is afraid of. He’s afraid an acceptable fix for DREAMers will pass Congress and he’s trying to protect Tr-mp from having to either sign or veto a bipartisan bill that won’t have all of the bigotry in it that Tr-mp and his fear-the-brown Brownshirts desire.

I totally doubt it, but I wish Tr-mp’s puss-filled bluster yesterday“Let’s have a shutdown”—had something to do with Pelosi’s actions this morning. But the truth is she had pressure from immigration reform activists on our side and felt compelled to at least speak up and put some small amount of pressure on Ryan. However, she wasn’t really leading a movement among her members to oppose the new bipartisan budget deal if Ryan didn’t commit to an open DACA process in the House. Thus, despite all the affirmation of Democratic support for DREAMers, they will have to wait for another day.

If I were a Democratic Party leader in Congress, after Tr-mp made all those noises about a shutdown in front of the cameras—coming on the heels of his calling Democrats “un-American” and “treasonous” for not acknowledging his elementary ability to read a speech off a teleprompter—I would have told my negotiators working on budget and DREAMer deals with Republicans to inform everyone that the game had changed: “Tr-mp will get his shutdown, since he wants it so bad, unless we stop talking nonsense about appeasing him with race-based fig leaves and stop talking about an effing wall.” And I would have added: “Don’t even think of blaming any goddamned shutdown on us. We have the tape.”

This may shock all of you, but I’m not a Democratic leader. I’m just a Democrat. And there seems to be no indication from my party’s leadership that Tr-mp’s widely-reported words about wanting a government shutdown gave Democrats more leverage in negotiations for DREAMers, leverage that was only good if leaders had the guts to use it behind the scenes. But they didn’t. Thus, despite Pelosi’s necessary but relatively feeble efforts on the House floor today, a budget deal has been made and Democrats in the Senate and House will provide enough votes to pass it.

And now we move on to the next deadline: March 5, when DACA protections expire. That day will come and Democrats will have lost an opportunity for a better deal, an opportunity that Tr-mp himself gave them yesterday.

The Chinese water torture will continue.

Hello Jell-O

In 1988, Mike Tyson and Michael Spinks fought for the undisputed heavyweight title in what was billed as one of the greatest fights in history. Ironically, the event was held in the now-defunct Tr-mp Plaza Hotel and Casino in New Jersey. Tr-mp called the fight a “monster.”

It lasted 91 seconds.

According to Wikipedia, Image result for mike tyson vs. michael spinksSpinks, the loser, conceded that “fear was knocking at my door big time.” Tyson (who today is a Tr-mper) reportedly said, “The first punch I threw, he wobbled a bit. I knew right there I had him.”

Sound familiar?

I don’t know what could have been more predictable than the outcome of the Senate Democrats’ efforts to get a deal on DACA and the DREAMers in exchange for the necessary votes to keep the government running. And I don’t know what could have been more predictable than how the press would cover the whole thing—as a fight with a clear winner and a clear loser.

CNN’s Jake Tapper is about as mainstream as journalists come. He is conventional in his view of politics and how to cover it. He began his Sunday news show with words straight from a fight promoter’s lexicon: “Shutdown showdown.” Senate Democrats, not being idiots, knew how the press would cover this story. It wasn’t hard to figure out: Who would blink first? Who would be able to take the tough punches? Who would stand and fight until they won? Now, after we have witnessed the political equivalent of a 91-second fight, we know the answers: Senate Democrats blinked first. They were unable to take a punch. And Republicans stood and fought until they won.

And you know why the Republicans won this political fight? Because they’re ruthless assholes. And in order to beat them, you have to either fight like ruthless assholes or you have to outsmart them. Democrats did neither one. They were Michael Spinks and found fear knocking at their door bigtime. Republicans were Mike Tyson—who once got pissed off during a fight and gnawed both of Evander Holyfield’s ears—who saw Democrats wobble a bit after the first punch was thrown and they knew they had Democrats then and there.

The wobble came when Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer met with Tr-mp last Friday. Schumer, who by now ought to know he can’t trust Tr-mp, admitted he offered to pay some amount of money for Tr-mp’s colossally stupid border wall. That was it. Fear had knocked on Schumer’s door and he answered it. Talk about Jell-O. Republicans then, sensing a sure victory, ratcheted up the rhetoric, including an unforgivable racist advertisement paid for by the Tr-mp campaign, an ad that Democrats answered by caving in to Mitch McConnell, allowing Tr-mp and his ugly apologists to claim victory for him.

The truth is that Democrats, the party of government, should never have, without a clear strategy and commitment to win, jumped into the shut-down-the-government ring with ruthless assholes who don’t much like government in the first place. Democrats are the good guys when it comes to the value of government and the services it provides, and using a shutdown as leverage runs contrary to their nature. They aren’t vicious cutthroats who use our troops as props in a sick game of chicken. They aren’t callous schmucks who use anti-immigrant racism to appeal to the worst instincts of some Americans and stoke resentment in others. That’s why Senate Democrats had to use their smarts, not their ruthlessness, to help the DREAMers.

And it just wasn’t very smart for them to get into a fight unless they were prepared to take some hard punches and still keep fighting. Clearly they weren’t. And the only thing that was accomplished by their well-meaning efforts, was that they look weaker than they really are. Senate Democrats can, with the filibuster, keep some bad things from happening to the country and help get a few good things done, like, possibly, a decent DACA-DREAMer bill. But behind that filibuster strategy has to be a willingness to, when it matters, stand in the ring and slug it out with Mitch McConnell, who is as ruthless as they come and as big an asshole as exists in Washington.

Speaking of assholes, one of Jake Tapper’s guests on his Sunday program was Mike Mulvaney, Tr-mp’s budget director and a former congressman who was one of the most zealous right-wingers imaginable. Tapper played a clip of Mulvaney—who supported the supposedly infamous shutdown in 2013 when Obama was in office—being asked if “the fight” in 2013 was worth it. Mulvaney said at the time:

MULVANEY: It was. Any time you fight for something you really believe in, and something you think is important, then the fight is — the fight is going to be worth it. If you stand up for what you believe in, I think you’ll always end up on the right side of things.

Apparently, Mulvaney was right. There he was on CNN and elsewhere on Sunday, four years and four months after that disgraceful shutdown in 2013, riding high as a proud member of the Tr-mp administration, enjoying his party’s complete control of every branch of the federal government. Neither he nor his party paid a price for their attempt to hold the country hostage for 17 days just because Republicans like Mulvaney and Ted Cruz did not like Obamacare. It didn’t hurt them a bit, as we are reminded every day when Tr-mp and Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell torment us with their presence. Democrats, when the next fight comes up, need to remember that. If DREAMers are worth fighting for, and if Republicans insist again on getting in a ring and having it out, then that’s what needs to be done—without political fear.

Michael Spinks, who lasted 91 seconds against Mike Tyson in 1988, retired and never fought another fight. Senate Democrats don’t have that option. They are elected officials who were put in office by their voters to do the right thing and fight the good fight. If they aren’t willing to do that when it matters, then Democratic primary voters should send them into retirement.

Is This The Country We Want?

It is certainly true that at least some Americans have the country they want. In one way or another they chose, they voted for, this stuff:

First, from CBS News:

A 39-year-old Detroit man who had lived in the U.S. for nearly 30 years has been deported to Mexico. Jorge Garcia came to the U.S. with his family when he was 10 years old and has long sought legal status. Garcia, who worked as a landscaper and had no criminal record, was deported on Monday and can’t return to the U.S. for a decade.

His wife and two children, who are all U.S. citizens, hugged him and sobbed as they said goodbye at the airport, the Detroit News reported.

This moral outrage is directly—directly—linked to voters who voted for Tr-mp, many of them falsely claiming to be “family values” voters. Family values my ass.


Recent research indicates:

The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world, and children born in America have a 70 percent greater chance of dying in childhood than those born in peer countries.

As you might have guessed, the problem is worse—twice as bad—if you’re black, especially if you’re poor and black. And, as you might have guessed, part of the problem has to do with the choices American voters make year after year:

According to the study’s authors, the problem of stillbirths in the U.S. is also heavily impacted by inequality among women and families, particularly with regard to healthcare access.

This moral outrage, lack of access to quality healthcare, is something voters could fix if they wanted to. Many are ignorant. Many don’t give a damn. I know that is true because Tr-mp’s approval rating after one year in office is still hovering around 40%, which is 40 points too high.


Related to that moral outrage is another one, summed up in the headline of a piece published by The New York Times, “Making Medicaid a Tool for Moral Education May Let Some Die.” The “moral education”—advanced by Republicans and championed by the Tr-mp administration of course—is the imposition of a work requirement on poor folks who get Medicaid. If you can work and don’t, forget about getting any health care. What will happen is predictable because it has been tried in Tennesse. People delayed doctor visits and used more expensive emergency rooms for treatment. Another result:

Delayed care can kill. Breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death among women. One of eight American women will get it. Detecting it early is critical. Specifically, the five-year relative survival rate for localized breast cancer is 98.5 percent when detected early, but only 25 percent when detected at a distant stage. Waiting for 60 days or longer to get treatment raises the risk of dying of breast cancer over five years by 85 percent.

Another study from Tennessee found that losing access to Medicaid led to delays in diagnosis, so more breast cancers were caught at a later stage. Women who lived in low-income ZIP codes were 3.3 percentage points more likely to receive a diagnosis of late-stage cancer than women living in high-income ZIP codes.

The author of that Times piece wrote:

The problem with the latest twist in Republicans’ effort to pare the social safety net is that removing the poor’s health insurance may not just make their life more difficult.

It might kill them.

Again, some folks just don’t give a damn.


Consider this headline in a country that is called, dubiously, the greatest country on earth by some people:

With CHIP funds running low, doctors and parents scramble to cover kids’ needs

In case you don’t know, CHIP is the Children’s Health Insurance Program—established under the Social Security Act—which provides healthcare to some 9 million lower-income kids. The reason the “CHIP funds” are “running low” is because of Republicans. Yep. It’s that simple. If you voted for a Republican, you voted for this moral outrage.


And if you voted for a Republican, any Republican, you contributed to the further erosion of reproductive rights. From Roll Call:

Anti-abortion groups, pursuing a list of priorities, hope to further capitalize on the Republican control of both chambers and the presidency in 2018.

Groups that oppose abortion scored a series of wins last year, including the appointment of several conservatives to top Department of Health and Human Services positions, the House passage of a late-term abortion ban bill and the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

On the list of priorities for anti-choice zealots is legislation that would ban abortions after 20 weeks. We all know, thanks to Republican voters across the country, that the bill could pass the House with plenty of room to spare. But thanks to voters across the country who put 49 Democrats in the Senate, it ain’t going anywhere there. So, if you care about reproductive freedom, thank someone in your life who voted for a Senate Democrat. Here’s my “you’re welcome” in advance.


Oh, by the way, there’s more to worry about on the reproductive rights front::

State officials are dismayed that the Trump administration has stalled the process for applying for new family planning money the states are counting on. Abortion advocacy groups worry that the delay may mean the administration is planning to target abortion providers or rewrite family planning policies.

How sick is it that people who pretend that abortion is murder are so eager to stand in the way of family planning money?


Last September, Tr-mp rescinded the Obama Administration’s DACA memorandum (“Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children”) that protected DREAMers, some 700,000 young folks who know, and only know, this land as their home but aren’t technically citizens. Tr-mp recently said (read: lied) he would sign any deal that could be worked out on DACA. Then, shithole-gate happened and he reneged (reneging is a natural reflex for him).

Thus, DREAMers are, by design or by neglect, in a constant state of fear about their futures. Again, this moral outrage is directly attributable to Republicans. Directly. Don’t even bother arguing about it. If you voted for a Republican for any federal office, you are responsible. Yes, even if you voted for Lindsey Graham.


Consider that there is still no director for the National Park Service and that Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke wants to nearly triple the fees at the busiest national parks. And consisder the following from an NPR story headlined “Majority Of National Park Service Board Resigns, Citing Administration Indifference“:

Since taking office, President Trump has sought to roll back protections of national parks and public lands under the auspices of the Department of the Interior. The administration has ordered a dramatic downsizing of two massive national monuments in Utah and has announced plans to open up oil drilling in protected areas of the Arctic and the Atlantic.


For the next outrage, I will go back to July of 2017:

Income Inequality Will Survive the Nuclear Apocalypse: The class responsible for the lucrative rush to war can literally buy its way out of annihilation, thanks to the boom in luxury bunkers.

I confess. I never really imagined there were such things as “luxury bunkers.” Modest doomsday bunkers, yes. But “posh shelters” where the rich “can ride out the coming calamity”? Nope. It just never occurred to me as it did to some folks:

…renovated and newly built bunkers have become popular with Trump’s compatriots in the upper crust. Which is only fitting, since he’s partly responsible for the boom: As the Independent reported earlier this year, “Americans [are] building doomsday bunkers in ‘record numbers’ since Donald Trump’s election.”

Perhaps the most offensive part of this story is how these wealthy folks have planned for their future security after they survive a nuclear holocaust:

But what about jealous outsiders? What if a roving band of mutant proletarians suddenly shows up at the front door? They’re prepared for that, too: The facility [in Kansas, of all places] has a well-stocked armory, a sniper post, and, per their website, “a military grade security system that includes visible spectrum cameras, infrared cameras, proximity sensors, microphones, trip sensors, passive detectors, as well as confidential defensive systems both automated and manually operated.” If the wretched of the scorched earth miraculously make it through all of that, they will then face walls up to nine feet thick, plus a series of blast doors “designed to withstand sizeable explosives.” Now that’s a gated community.

The fact that these wealthy folks have so much spare cash on hand—prices for the Kansas silos begin at $1.5 million for 920 sq. ft and go up to $4.5 million for “penthouse units”— is one thing. It is another thing, a thing that results from our choices as citizens, that such facilities can be planned and built and sold. And if you are tempted to think that prohibiting such activity is an outrageous idea, then tell me this: Why can’t you plan, build, and sell an opium farm?


Finally, on to some personal responsibility. I, like most Americans, have used Amazon to purchase items. Here’s what my personal choice, added to the choices of millions upon millions of Americans, has wrought:

Amazon Is Thriving Thanks to Taxpayer DollarsThe tech giant has received more than $1 billion in tax breaks. The government is also funding food stamps for many of its workers.

As the linked article makes clear, Amazon’s welfare-queen status is “a concerted strategy.” Six years ago, Amazon hired “a specialist in economic development tax credits,” which is a fancy way of saying “a specialist in corporate welfare.” But the bloodsucking doesn’t end there:

The famously grueling jobs in Amazon warehouses have also created strains on local services. Bloomberg reported in October that emergency responders visit the Amazon warehouse in Licking County [Ohio] at least once a day to attend to an injured worker. Local residents have to fund those forays because Amazon pays no property tax in Licking County under their subsidy deal. Voters approved a $6.5 million property tax levy in November to keep the Fire Department operational.

Image result for amazon logoWe all should think about that the next time we click on Amazon to order something. Not only does it hurt retail jobs in our communities, it costs us in other ways. There just ain’t no free lunch. Many of us thought we were getting a good deal when Amazon began and didn’t charge sales tax for purchases, which at the time gave it a critical advantage over local retailers. Amazon also exploited other “loopholes in tax legislation” that have led to this:

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has a net worth of about $100 billion. Take that down to $99.5 billion and nobody working at any Amazon facility in America would need assistance to eat.

The problem is that Jeff Bezos isn’t in the “assistance to eat” business. And the fact that he feels no need to be in that business is partly my fault—and yours if you use Amazon. And, perhaps more important, it is the fault of all those voters who don’t demand from politicians laws requiring employers to pay a living wage to all workers.


Some of us, indeed, have the country we want. Our choices—how we use our suffrage and our savings—have consequences.

Genius Democrats? Hardly.

♦ His mental state is being openly and widely questioned in polite society.

♦ He was just named the world’s numero uno oppressor of press freedom by the Committee to Protect Journalists.

♦ He pardoned a disgusting fellow racist from Arizona who announced today he is running for a seat in the United States Senate.

♦ He begged the Russians for election help, fired the FBI Director who was investigating his and his campaign’s role in an attack on our electoral system by those Russians, and has constantly run interference for the man, Vladimir Putin, who authorized that attack. Oh, and he has viciously slandered those who have continued investigating the attack on our country.

♦ He has made life miserable for countless immigrants, both through his personal rhetoric and his administration’s policies, while making life for neo-Nazis much more comfortable.

♦ He just signed a tax bill that robs from our kids’ futures, jeopardizes social programs, and enriches already rich Americans and corporations.

So, naturally, some Democrats met with Tr-mp today on immigration and helped legitimize and normalize him, helped make him look like something other than the bumbling, lying fool most of us know he is, and that most Democratic politicians try to suggest he is, when they seek our support. Huh?

I don’t know anymore. I don’t know what is wrong with a Democratic Party leadership group that collectively tries to claim Tr-mp is unfit for office while simultaneously sanctioning open meetings with him—Dick Durbin and Steny Hoyer sat right next to him today—the visual effect of which was to make him look at least marginally fit. He didn’t drool or grab anyone’s crotch. He didn’t speak in unknown tongues or slur his words. He didn’t scream obscenities or order those gathered to “get up” and give him a standing ovation. With cameras rolling, he bantered back and forth just long enough, and with just enough understanding of the issues to fool an untutored public, that eager television pundits could score this a “win” for Tr-mp, coming as it does when the political sky is full of dark clouds about Tr-mp’s stability and temperament and, yes, his sanity.

Nancy Pelosi tweeted the following yesterday:

pelosi tweet

Why, if we are to believe Nancy Pelosi is sincere (I do), did she allow any Democrat in the House, not to mention Steny Hoyer, the Democratic Whip, to attend a televised meeting with Tr-mp in which the “symbol of hate” was a topic of discussion, a bargaining chip? Please. Somebody explain. I beg you. How can a Democratic leader call Tr-mp’s border wall an “immoral and hateful obsession” and then watch Democrats cordially meet with the obsessed man and talk about it?

Meanwhile, congratulations, Democrats. You just made it a little bit harder to rid the country of the menace that is Donald Tr-mp and the Republicans who empower him. You were props in an ongoing surreality show that, after today, has at least a better chance of a second season. And what did you get for your cameos? This:

Ample Confusion After White House Immigration Meeting

Maybe Tr-mp is right after all. Maybe he is “a very stable genius” and some Democrats in Congress are the idiots.

Unpresidented, Again

“There’s never really been a time when a generation of people, raised and rooted in the United States, has been stripped of official recognition and pushed back into the precarity of unauthorized-immigrant life.”

—Dara Lind, of Vox

Dara Lind explains stuff for Vox. This morning she wrote of the nasty DACA reversal decision ordered by one racist coward, Tr-mp, and announced by another racist with bigger balls, Sessions. Lind’s article (“Why ending DACA is so unprecedented“) featured this gem:

Undoing DACA would widen the gulf between reality and law. And that gulf is, in some ways, broader than it’s ever been before. What truly makes the end of DACA unprecedented, in the broad sweep of US history, is the size of that gap between the law and the reality.

With DACA hanging in the balance, America has a group of people on the verge of being socially integrated, but legally isolated — socially championed, but legally victimized — in a way we’ve never really seen before.

Well, we’ve seen a lot of things lately we’ve never seen before. And, somehow, one never gets used to it. Every affront still shocks. But Lind pointed out something that I think many of us either didn’t know or forgot about our border history with Mexico:

Historically, it was easy enough to cross the US/Mexico border and work in the US — both because it was simply easier to enter the country by land without being detected than to sail into New York harbor, and because (partly because it was so hard to regulate) the US government didn’t restrict immigration from the Americas the way it did from the Eastern Hemisphere.

It was so easy, in fact, that immigrants were often simply migrating back and forth. “Immigrants preferred to live in Mexico for most of the time,” Stanford historian Ana Minian explains, “and then come for short periods of time, sometimes up to a couple years, and then return to Mexico until they needed to come back again.”

It wasn’t until the second half of the 20th century that the US made it harder to legally immigrate from Mexico. After that, it was still possible to come to the US and work — just not legally. So the circular migration continued, but its legal status changed.

She notes that the “circular flow” stopped in the 1990s, when border security was beefed up and the crossings became riskier (thanks to a bipartisan effort in Congress and with Bill Clinton’s signature on a little-known law that, in Lind’s words, “essentially eliminated an existing back door to legal status” and “locked a front door to legal status, too”). Thus, many of the immigrants simply just stayed here rather than take the border-crossing risk. And their kids stayed with them. Today we call those kids DREAMers. And this country is the only home they know.

In June of 2012, President Obama spoke in the Rose Garden about his decision to create the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. He talked about the DREAMers:

These are young people who study in our schools, they play in our neighborhoods, they’re friends with our kids, they pledge allegiance to our flag.  They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way but one:  on paper.  They were brought to this country by their parents — sometimes even as infants — and often have no idea that they’re undocumented until they apply for a job or a driver’s license, or a college scholarship.

Put yourself in their shoes.  Imagine you’ve done everything right your entire life — studied hard, worked hard, maybe even graduated at the top of your class — only to suddenly face the threat of deportation to a country that you know nothing about, with a language that you may not even speak.

Unable to put himself in anyone’s shoes but his own, Tr-mp, with the help of his loathsome and lying Attorney General, just told these DACA beneficiaries that they aren’t welcome here unless a Republican Congress, which isn’t even able to confidently guarantee the nation’s bills will be paid without defaulting, can rescue them within six months. Jesus.

John Kennedy wrote a book in 1958 called A Nation of Immigrants. On the back cover of a posthumous edition published in 1964 are these words:

Throughout his presidency, John F. Kennedy was passionate about the issue of immigration reform. He believed that America is a nation of people who value both tradition and the exploration of new frontiers, people who deserve the freedom to build better lives for themselves in their adopted homeland.

Man. What was he thinking?

sessions on dacaAs I write, Senator Lindsey Graham, who applauded Tr-mp’s action today, said this is a “defining moment” for the Republican Party to get this right, to fix our “broken immigration system” by helping the DREAMers. Well, I don’t know about you, but I’ve seen a lot of “defining moments” for the Republican Party over the last several years. And they have certainly defined themselves, time and again. They are now defined by that Orange Racist Creep who didn’t have the guts to go out himself today and tell the DREAMers they were now at the mercy of the same congressional Republicans who supported him, a man who began and maintains his putrid political career by scapegoating immigrants.

%d bloggers like this: